Why do management teams make bad decisions? The 7 most common mistakes at the top management level and how to eliminate them
Management decisions shape the future of a company. This statement sounds like a cliché, but in practice it means something very specific: a few decisions made each year by top management can determine the profitability of an organization for years to come. A strategic mistake is not "one of many mistakes" — it is a mistake with the most far-reaching consequences.
And yet, even experienced management boards regularly make bad decisions. Not because they are incompetent, but because they operate under pressure, with an excess of stimuli, conflicts of interest, and cognitive limitations. This article shows the most common sources of bad management decisions and ways to limit them.
1. Lack of a clear decision-making model (i.e., power chaos)
Many companies do not have clearly defined rules: who makes decisions, how, when to consult on an issue, and when to act immediately. As a result:
decisions are postponed,
the management returns to the same issues repeatedly,
informal coalitions are formed,
stronger personalities dominate rather than arguments.
This is not a "communication" problem — it is a management architecture problem. A well-functioning management team has clear rules: the decision-making process is repeatable and immune to emotions.
2. Intuition dominates data
Intuition can be valuable, but in strategic management it can also be costly. Common problems include:
decisions based on individual examples (rather than trends),
lack of scenario analysis,
confusing correlation with causation,
excessive confidence.
Management should be able to combine intuition with data and skillfully ask analytical questions. The key is not "having reports," but the ability to interpret them and translate them into courses of action.
3. Reactive rather than strategic action
A large proportion of management boards do not manage the company strategically, but rather react to current events. When every week is spent putting out fires, the company:
there is no real long-term plan,
projects are launched and abandoned,
there is a lack of consistency in building competitive advantage.
Strategy is not about a company having a PowerPoint slide. Strategy is the ability to choose priorities and say no. In practice, this means fewer initiatives, better execution, and greater clarity.
4. Conflicts in the management board instead of constructive differences of opinion
Conflict is not bad. What is bad is the lack of rules for dealing with conflict. Two extreme styles are common in management boards:
"we all agree" (i.e., avoiding difficult topics),
"constant struggle" (i.e., competition for influence and being right).
In both cases, the organization pays for it with a decline in the quality of decisions, and the management team loses faith in the consistency of the company's direction.
Professionalizing the work of the board requires soft skills at the highest level: negotiation, mediation, dealing with tension, managing emotions, but also the ability to make tough decisions.
5. Lack of understanding of the organization "from the inside"
Some management boards function as a separate world. They have indicators, results, reports, but they have no real contact with what is happening in the organization. The consequences:
the goals are incomprehensible to the teams,
the strategy is "imposed" rather than implemented,
a culture of appearances and reporting to expectations is created.
The management board should be able to translate strategy into operational language: tasks, responsibilities, metrics, schedules, and communication. Without this, even a good strategy remains theoretical.
6. Lack of internal and external negotiation skills
Negotiations are not just talks with customers and suppliers. Management negotiates every day:
budgets between departments,
project priorities,
terms of cooperation with key partners,
scope of responsibility,
"what is more important" and "what do we do first."
In practice, many conflicts in management boards do not result from a lack of competence, but from a lack of negotiation tools and an inability to agree on a common position.
7. Lack of management rhythm and consistency in execution
Even the best decisions are useless if the company is unable to deliver on them.
Boards often lack:
review rituals (short and regular),
clear reporting formats (the minimum that is sufficient),
control of implementation (ownership),
accountability for results, not actions.
The result is predictable: projects drag on, priorities change, and the company loses energy to operational chaos.
Effective management builds a rhythm in which a decision means action, and action means results.
Summary: the source of errors is not people, but the management system
The biggest paradox is this: most decision-making errors at the management level are not the result of bad intentions or lack of experience, but of a lack of system.
If management does not have established decision-making processes, communication rules, and conflict resolution tools, even the best leaders will act chaotically.
That is why the development of top management is today the investment with the highest return: because it strengthens the company's decision-making center.
If you are looking for managerial board training in Poland, check our offer: